Personal leather goods (e.g., coin purses, eyeglass cases, key cases), small, manufacturing · Missouri

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd.

Sainte Genevieve, MO · ~91 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Personal leather goods (e.g., coin purses, eyeglass cases, key cases), small, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd.: 7.6 TCR = 231% of Personal leather goods (e.g., coin purses, eyeglass cases, key cases), small, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. safety composite

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd.: 4.6 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2019

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd.'s TCR rose 2.1 from 4.6 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 316998 · Sainte Genevieve, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 231% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Barbour Welting Comp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barbour Welting Company Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. averages 7.6 TCR (231% of the Personal leather goods (e.g., coin purses, eyeglass cases, key cases), small, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. falls in its industry

32 Personal leather goods (e.g., establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Personal leather goods (e.g., employers in Missouri.

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. (91 employees, TCR 7.6) among 26 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 27 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd.
Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. (91 employees, TCR 7.6) among 26 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Eric Scott Leathers, Ltd. has more employees than the Personal leather goods (e.g., coin purse median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.7 4.0 5 0 0
2018 12.8 11.5 10 0 0
2017 6.4 3.8 5 0 0
2016 4.6 3.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

316998 · MO · Sainte Genevieve

32 Personal leather goods (e.g., coin purses, eyeglass cases, key cases), small, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 5 employers in Sainte Genevieve, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barbour Welting Company Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Road Cases USA, Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maverick Desk 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & R Holdings, Inc. 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CPC Missouri Smithville LLC dba Local Cannabis 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - 801 Charlotte 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boone Electric Cooperative 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips Hardy Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverview at the Park Care and Rehabilitation Center 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR MLDS 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 287104-SAINTE GENEVIEVE PO 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAINTE GENEVIEVE_1380459 20 FTE
NAT-TCR 160 East Sunrise Hwy 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR West Burnside Store 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Whites Path CCI 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schiff's Restaurant Service, Inc 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Erie 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairbanks Transporation 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kencor, Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Para Transit 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.