Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Massachusetts

Erland Construction, Inc.

Burlington, MA · ~99 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Erland Construction, Inc. runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Erland Construction, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 38% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Erland Construction, Inc. safety composite

Erland Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Erland Construction, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Erland Construction, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.0 in 2023 to 1.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Burlington, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/100
  • PHOTO Mader Southeast
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mader Southeast (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Erland Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Erland Construction, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (38% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Erland Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2023=1 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.9

Where Erland Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 100 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Massachusetts.

Erland Construction, Inc. (99 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Erland Construction, Inc.
Erland Construction, Inc. (99 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Erland Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Burlington

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 89 employers in Burlington, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mader Southeast 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Construction, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garmong Construction Servies 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOB BREEDING GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jushi MA, Inc 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JK Glass Company, Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adtech Systems LLC 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Electric Company INc 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lahey Hospital and Medical Center 4,493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burlington, MA 4,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lahey Medical Center 4,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR EMD Millipore Corporation - 400 Summit 838 FTE
NAT-TCR Premier South, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0282 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Painters & Decorators, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR IOSM Inc. dba On-Site Health & Safety 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Verhoff Machine & Welding Inc 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunday Riley Modern Skincare LLC 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elgin Die Mold 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allen Health and Rehabilitation 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.