Shoring, construction · California

Erosion Control Applications, Inc.

Anaheim, CA · ~107 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Shoring, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Erosion Control Applications, Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 79% of Shoring, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. safety composite

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2024

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. injury rate improved

Erosion Control Applications, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 1.8 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Anaheim, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #69/171
  • PHOTO Superior Waterproofi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Superior Waterproofing & Restoration Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Erosion Control Applications, Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (79% of the Shoring, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Erosion Control Applications, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Shoring, construction establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 171 Shoring, construction employers in California.

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. (107 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Erosion Control Applications, Inc.
Erosion Control Applications, Inc. (107 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Erosion Control Applications, Inc. has more employees than the Shoring, construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 4 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Anaheim

1,634 Shoring, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Superior Waterproofing & Restoration Co., Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Philadelphia Branch 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana Concrete Pumpers LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentagon Technologies Site Services - Microchip 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Munger Bros, LLC 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Transplanting 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte California LLC - Blythe Ranch 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Tomato Growers, Inc. 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Quantum Color Graphics , LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S&S Automotive Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DXI Industries 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR C.S. Osborne & Co. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Falling Water Healthcare Center 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fernandes Masonry 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acmt, Inc 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Crest Resort 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.