Distribution of electric power · Tennessee

Erwin Utilities

Name: Erwin Utilities Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Erwin, TN · ~51 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 2.8
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Erwin Utilities runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Erwin Utilities: 2.8 TCR = 233% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Erwin Utilities safety composite

Erwin Utilities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2021

Erwin Utilities injury rate improved

Erwin Utilities's TCR fell 4.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Erwin, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.8 · 233% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #25/70
PHOTO Centerville District
BOOK 6y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Centerville District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.8
Centerville Di

2.8
O&R Middletown

2.8
PEC-Oak Hill

2.8
Williston Offi

2.8

What this shows Erwin Utilities averages 2.8 TCR (233% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Erwin Utilities TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Erwin Utilities falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 70 Distribution of electric power employers in Tennessee.

Erwin Utilities (51 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Erwin Utilities has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	1.9	0.0	1
2020	3.7	1.9	2
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	2.1	2.1	1
2017	2.2	2.2	1
2016	6.8	4.5	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TN · Erwin

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 24 employers in Erwin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Centerville District	CENTERVILLE, IA	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	O&R Middletown	MIDDLETOWN, NY	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PEC-Oak Hill	AUSTIN, TX	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Williston Office	WILLISTON, ND	2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Denark Construction, Inc.	KNOXVILLE	51 FTE
STATE-SIZE	JOSEPH Construction Company, Inc.	KNOXVILLE	51 FTE
STATE-SIZE	J. S. Haren Company	ATHENS	51 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rogers Group, Inc.-Southern Middle TN Construction	LAWRENCEBURG	51 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.	Erwin	722 FTE
CITY-NEAR	TN-Tennessee, LLC.	Erwin	195 FTE
CITY-NEAR	TN Tennessee, LLC	Erwin	193 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Erwin Health Care Center	Erwin	135 FTE
NAT-TCR	Doubletree Hotel by Hilton Madison	Madison, WI	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Gulf Business Forms, Inc.	San Marcos, TX	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	John Mills Electric, Inc.	Elmira Heights, NY	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mercedes Office	Mercedes, TX	2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Brewery - Clipper City	Baltimore, MD	51 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Folsom Buick GMC	Folsom, CA	51 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Azura Memory Care of Oconomowoc	Oconomowoc, WI	51 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Westlake Chemical-BV	Booneville, MS	51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.