Janitorial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE

Lithia Springs, GA · ~91 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Janitorial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE: 2.1 TCR = 97% of Janitorial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE safety composite

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2019→2024

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE injury rate improved

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423850 · Lithia Springs, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.1 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO 708
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 708 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE averages 2.1 TCR (97% of the Janitorial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE TCR series: 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE falls in its industry

253 Janitorial equipment and suppl establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Janitorial equipment and suppl employers in Georgia.

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE (91 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE
Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE (91 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Essendant: Atlanta (Lithia Springs) FE has more employees than the Janitorial equipment and supplies mercha median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423850 · GA · Lithia Springs

253 Janitorial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 122 employers in Lithia Springs, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 708 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Hampshire 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viking SupplyNet - Columbus 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Team USA 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant McDonough 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Building Brands-MBCI (Atlanta) 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juneau 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGA Division 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Skyview 673 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA-LITHI02 671 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Ct 655 FTE
NAT-TCR 150 - Ontario 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Field Aerospace 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fifth and Union Market 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southborough 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belridge 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE 011k - Greenbay Wi Rntl 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Burbank - Library Administration 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE AG Group LLC 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.