Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Massachusetts

Essential Logistics Corporation

Pittsfield, MA · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Essential Logistics Corporation runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Essential Logistics Corporation: 15.4 TCR = 237% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Essential Logistics Corporation safety composite

Essential Logistics Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Essential Logistics Corporation: 14.4 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2024

Essential Logistics Corporation's TCR rose 1.4 from 14.4 in 2022 to 15.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Pittsfield, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 237% of ind

  • DART 14.1 DART
  • RANK #150/164
  • PHOTO 917
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 917 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Essential Logistics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Essential Logistics Corporation averages 15.4 TCR (237% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Essential Logistics Corporation TCR series: 2022=14.4 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=15.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Essential Logistics Corporation falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 164 Express delivery services (exc employers in Massachusetts.

Essential Logistics Corporation (71 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Essential Logistics Corporation
Essential Logistics Corporation (71 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Essential Logistics Corporation has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.8 14.1 9 0 0
2023 15.9 14.4 11 0 0
2022 14.4 10.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MA · Pittsfield

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 94 employers in Pittsfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 917 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 447 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 759 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TROUGAL LLC 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE OW NA 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - New Bedford Gas 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J CONTRACTORS, INC. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fred DeRoma & Son, Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springside Rehabilitation & Skilled Care Center 3,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMAPF01 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkshire County Arc, Inc. 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMAPFB1 572 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Bridgeport Health Department 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bourn 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LeafGuard of Seattle 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sacramento ear Nose and Throat- Stockton 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hillsboro 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lloyd Industries 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Olney 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE LRS - Wauconda 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.