General warehousing and storage · Pennsylvania

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA

Chester Springs, PA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA runs at 301% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade F.

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA: 17.4 TCR = 301% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA safety composite

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.2

2022→2023

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA injury rate improved

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA's TCR fell 14.2 from 24.5 in 2022 to 10.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 24.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=24.5 · 2023=10.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Chester Springs, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.4 · 301% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #636/650
  • PHOTO 2393 Pet1000
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2393 Pet1000 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA averages 17.4 TCR (301% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA TCR series: 2022=24.5 · 2023=10.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #636 safest of 650 General warehousing and storag employers in Pennsylvania.

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA (22 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA
Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA (22 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ethan Allen Service Center - Chester Springs PA has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.3 10.3 2 0 0
2022 24.5 24.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Chester Springs

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 27 employers in Chester Springs, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2393 Pet1000 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SGS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC4 Carteret 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Operations 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dawson's Orchards 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kuhn Orchards, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giorgi Mushroom Farm 3 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Tank Lines 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philadelphia PA FXFE-PHL 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000000703 130 FTE
NAT-TCR Welcome Nursing Home 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2393 Pet1000 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 055674-Orangevale Po 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcadian Cove 17.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gateway FS, Inc - FS Construction Services 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Svc Ctr 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avery Abrasives Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Minneapolis 3325 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.