Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio

Euclid Heat Treating

Euclid, OH · ~62 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Euclid Heat Treating runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Euclid Heat Treating: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Euclid Heat Treating safety composite

Euclid Heat Treating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2024

Euclid Heat Treating injury rate improved

Euclid Heat Treating's TCR fell 5.9 from 9.7 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Euclid, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #24/34
  • PHOTO Superior Metals
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Superior Metals (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Euclid Heat Treating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Euclid Heat Treating averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Euclid Heat Treating TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=5 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Euclid Heat Treating falls in its industry

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 34 Hardening (i.e., heat treating employers in Ohio.

Euclid Heat Treating (62 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Euclid Heat Treating
Euclid Heat Treating (62 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Euclid Heat Treating has more employees than the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.7 1.9 4 0 0
2021 7.6 5.7 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.0 1.6 3 0 0
2016 9.7 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · OH · Euclid

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 64 employers in Euclid, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Superior Metals 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR METAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Columbus 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Improvement Company, LLC. - Phoenix 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Croton 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colerain Operations Center 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus NE Svc Ctr 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE 916-NiSource-Mansfield OH-Heartland Op Ctr 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLE3 4,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CLE3 3,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lincoln Electric Company - Euclid 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DCL1 1,008 FTE
NAT-TCR Friendship, Industries, INC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus GA Millwork 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RDF Builders Co. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Peerless Electric 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Ag LLC - Eastern Business Unit 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley View Manor 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Fabrication,Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mueller Inc. 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.