Airport baggage handling services · District of Columbia

Eulen Aviation DCA Station

Washington, DC · ~127 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eulen Aviation DCA Station runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade B.

Eulen Aviation DCA Station: 3.5 TCR = 77% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eulen Aviation DCA Station safety composite

Eulen Aviation DCA Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eulen Aviation DCA Station: 3.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

Eulen Aviation DCA Station's TCR rose 0.9 from 3.0 in 2023 to 4.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Swissport Ground Han…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Swissport Ground Handling - CLE - CLE-GHA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Eulen Aviation DCA Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eulen Aviation DCA Station averages 3.5 TCR (77% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eulen Aviation DCA Station TCR series: 2023=3 · 2024=4 · BLS 4.5

Where Eulen Aviation DCA Station falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Airport baggage handling servi employers in District of Columbia.

Eulen Aviation DCA Station (127 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Eulen Aviation DCA Station
Eulen Aviation DCA Station (127 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Eulen Aviation DCA Station has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 3 1 0
2023 3.0 2.0 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · DC · Washington

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Swissport Ground Handling - CLE - CLE-GHA 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDF Louisville International Airport 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prospect Airport Services MDW 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Aviation - PBI 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT U. S. HOUSE FOOD SERVICE OPERATION 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Transit Police Department District 1 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Atomics - GWD01 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-SWY 0035 2737 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Dana Distributors, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Electronics Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Office - Centerpoint Dallas 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Super K Express LLP 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Dallas 2424 E 38th Ave 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Aluminum Forge 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village Healthcare & Rehabilitation 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bain Enterprises, LLC 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.