Ambulance and fire service combined · Illinois

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District

Eureka, IL · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Ambulance and fire service combined workplace, earning a grade C.

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District: 2.9 TCR = 89% of Ambulance and fire service combined BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District safety composite

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 5.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Eureka, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/262
  • PHOTO City of Clive Fire D…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Clive Fire Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District averages 2.9 TCR (89% of the Ambulance and fire service combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District TCR series: 2022=0 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District falls in its industry

793 Ambulance and fire service com establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 262 Ambulance and fire service com employers in Illinois.

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District (59 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District
Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District (59 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Eureka-Goodfield Fire Protection District has more employees than the Ambulance and fire service combined median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Eureka

793 Ambulance and fire service combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 15 employers in Eureka, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Clive Fire Department 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornwall Volunteer Fire Department 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 153 LONG GROVE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cornbelt Fire Protection District 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Electric Field Meter Services 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0G5 - Gas Tech - Engineering 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apostolic Christian Home of Eureka 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocate Eureka Hospital 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transportation 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cox Transfer Inc 97 FTE
NAT-TCR 3325 - North Quincy T Station 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR C Machine Co Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabinets To Go 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pallet Advisors, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE S. E. Cline Construction, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE TAB Construction 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avient Corporation 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE NuGen Energy 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.