Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers · Wisconsin

Eutectic Corporation

Menomonee Falls, WI · ~88 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eutectic Corporation runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Eutectic Corporation: 4.2 TCR = 190% of Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eutectic Corporation safety composite

Eutectic Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2024

Eutectic Corporation injury rate improved

Eutectic Corporation's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.5 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2018=3.9 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423840 · Menomonee Falls, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 190% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #18/25
  • PHOTO Colliflower Baltimore
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colliflower Baltimore (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Eutectic Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eutectic Corporation averages 4.2 TCR (190% of the Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eutectic Corporation TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2018=3.9 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Eutectic Corporation falls in its industry

589 Welding supplies (except weldi establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 25 Welding supplies (except weldi employers in Wisconsin.

Eutectic Corporation (88 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Eutectic Corporation
Eutectic Corporation (88 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eutectic Corporation has more employees than the Welding supplies (except welding gases) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 8.1 5.8 6 1 0
2022 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 3.9 1.0 3 1 0
2016 7.5 3.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423840 · WI · Menomonee Falls

589 Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 206 employers in Menomonee Falls, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colliflower Baltimore 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR F&M Ohio 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cummins Rocky Mount 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN100 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Stone Co. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indianhead Pipeline Services, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Affiliated Construction Services, Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR 900 - Corporate Offices 4,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR 900 - Corporate Office 4,231 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT MENOMONEE FALLS HOSPITAL 1,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Memorial Hospital 1,405 FTE
NAT-TCR DDB Unlimited, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR U.S. Display Group - California 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Old Man Production 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill of Central Illinois - University 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chapin International Kentucky Division 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodcraft Industries, Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnstone Supply - IDC 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCarthy Improvement Company 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.