Religious organizations · Minnesota

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA)

Minneapolis, MN · ~405 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Religious organizations workplace, earning a grade A.

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA): 0.5 TCR = 24% of Religious organizations BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) safety composite

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) held a steady TCR band

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813110 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #2/28
  • PHOTO Good Shepherd Golden…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~405 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Good Shepherd Golden Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) averages 0.5 TCR (24% of the Religious organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) falls in its industry

70 Religious organizations establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 28 Religious organizations employers in Minnesota.

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) (405 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA)
Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) (405 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Evangelical Free Church of America (EFCA) has more employees than the Religious organizations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2017 0.5 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813110 · MN · Minneapolis

70 Religious organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Good Shepherd Golden Valley 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diocese of Crookston 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reformed University Fellowship 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Wesleyan University 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Veit & Company 405 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9705 Data Park 405 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY EAST GRAND FORKS 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eggs - Monticello MN 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Green Diesel 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR US Conec Ltd-830 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR National Oilwell Varco - Houston Creekmont T3 Pressure Control - Operations 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dowagiac Campus 405 FTE
NAT-SIZE University Park (Dralle Road) 405 FTE
NAT-SIZE US IL Effingham DSC 405 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mondelez International-Rockford Plant 405 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.