Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing · Colorado

Evans Manufacturing

Denver, CO · ~93 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evans Manufacturing runs at 275% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Evans Manufacturing: 9.1 TCR = 275% of Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evans Manufacturing safety composite

Evans Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2016→2024

Evans Manufacturing injury rate improved

Evans Manufacturing's TCR fell 6.9 from 12.8 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.8 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 275% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/19
  • PHOTO PCI INDUSTRIES (Pott…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PCI INDUSTRIES (Pottorff) CA Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Evans Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evans Manufacturing averages 9.1 TCR (275% of the Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evans Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2017=8 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Evans Manufacturing falls in its industry

1,158 Ducts, sheet metal, manufactur establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 19 Ducts, sheet metal, manufactur employers in Colorado.

Evans Manufacturing (93 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Evans Manufacturing
Evans Manufacturing (93 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Evans Manufacturing has more employees than the Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 0.0 4 0 0
2023 10.3 0.0 7 0 0
2022 9.9 0.0 8 0 0
2021 11.5 0.0 10 0 0
2020 7.3 0.0 6 0 0
2019 5.6 0.0 5 0 0
2018 10.5 0.0 9 0 0
2017 8.0 0.0 7 0 0
2016 12.8 0.0 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CO · Denver

1,158 Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PCI INDUSTRIES (Pottorff) CA Plant 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garmat 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sal J. Acosta Sheetmetal Manufacturing Co., Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMI OH-1 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Big Johnson Construction 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dutch's Masonry 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Architectural Concepts 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEI Companies, Inc. HQ 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Berlin Hardwood Components and Main Office 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelby Crossinig Health Campus 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Shepherd Community Care & Rehabilitation 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Socal Berry Growers LLC 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Select Trusses & Lumber, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston - BMD 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advantage Tank Lines 20331 - Indianapolis 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations - Big Hill 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.