Civil engineering services · Ohio

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc

Columbus, OH · ~322 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Civil engineering services workplace, earning a grade C.

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc: 0.6 TCR = 118% of Civil engineering services BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc safety composite

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc injury rate improved

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.6 · 118% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #12/23
  • PHOTO Broadview Product De…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~322 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Broadview Product Development (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc averages 0.6 TCR (118% of the Civil engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc falls in its industry

690 Civil engineering services establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 23 Civil engineering services employers in Ohio.

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc (322 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc
Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc (322 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Evans Mechwart Hambleton & Tilton, Inc has more employees than the Civil engineering services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 1.1 0.6 3 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2019 1.4 0.5 5 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2016 0.8 0.8 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · OH · Columbus

690 Civil engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Broadview Product Development 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brock Solutions US Inc./Brock Solutions US Systems LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHC Consulting, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HUNTSVILLE_AL 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ContiTech Fairlawn 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alliance Tubular Products LLC, Alliance Plant 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chase Brass and Copper Company, LLC. 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valeo Hamilton 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Balestrieri Environmental & Development, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tibi Corporate Office - New York 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. Field Sales 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ABS Global - Pepsi Way 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Lincoln Hospital 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE HVAMA03 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4M - Jacksonville 322 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.