Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Indiana

Evansville Branch

Evansville, IN · ~136 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evansville Branch runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Evansville Branch: 2.9 TCR = 140% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evansville Branch safety composite

Evansville Branch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2023

Evansville Branch injury rate improved

Evansville Branch's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Evansville, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.9 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/90
  • PHOTO Omnilift Allentown
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Omnilift Allentown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Evansville Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evansville Branch averages 2.9 TCR (140% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evansville Branch TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Evansville Branch falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 90 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Indiana.

Evansville Branch (136 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Evansville Branch
Evansville Branch (136 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Evansville Branch has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 4 0 1
2021 5.4 5.4 4 0 0
2020 3.4 2.2 3 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 2.1 3 0 0
2016 4.5 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IN · Evansville

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Omnilift Allentown 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wiese Terre Haute 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austell BCP 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1190 - BAMCOR Cleveland OH 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Tipton1 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA ICE CREAM - DECATUR IN 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Wayne Bakery 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Nappanee, LLC 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Pensacola 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie Memorial Housing 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilex Poly - Carrollton 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rpm, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willmar Middle School 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0147 - Arapahoe 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sundial Beach Resort & Spa 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gainesville - Gv 3 - Cook Poultry/Sausag 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.