Food packaging machinery manufacturing · Iowa

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~168 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Food packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids safety composite

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids held a steady TCR band

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Cedar Rapids, IA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P97
  • PHOTO Pacific Packaging, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific Packaging, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Food packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids falls in its industry

269 Food packaging machinery manuf establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids (168 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids
Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids (168 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids has more employees than the Food packaging machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · IA · Cedar Rapids

269 Food packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific Packaging, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focke & Co., Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pneumatic Scale Angelus 2 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4301 Orlando Automated Pkg Systems 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grain Millers Inc. 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plumrose USA, Inc. CB2 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE LeClaire MFG Foundry 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winegard North Plant 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Evergreen Packaging - Kalamazoo 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Longview Glass Co. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - TN115 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Phoenix 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 10420 Indian School Plaza (WO) 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE 700 S. Pearl St - Main Building 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4223-M2800 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 55 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.