Retirement communities, continuing care · Ohio

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living

Cincinnati, OH · ~128 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living: 6.1 TCR = 162% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living safety composite

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2022→2024

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living injury rate improved

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living's TCR fell 11.2 from 12.3 in 2022 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.3 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 162% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #137/234
  • PHOTO The Savoy
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Savoy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living averages 6.1 TCR (162% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living TCR series: 2022=12.3 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 234 Retirement communities, contin employers in Ohio.

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living (128 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living
Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living (128 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Evergreen Retirement Community/Assisted Living has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 4 0 0
2022 12.3 11.2 2 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Cincinnati

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Savoy 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR COVENANT VILLAGE OF CO 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glendale Place Nursing and Rehab 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Southlake - 463 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monfort Heights 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schumacher Homes of Operations, Inc 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Romanoff Electric Inc 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sexton Industrial 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Don Pancho Authentic Mexican Foods 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock LLC 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR We Recycle Solar, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GQ investments DBA Fine Art handcrafted Lighting 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northampton PA - 227 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buske Lines Inc. 790/791/792 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyundai of Fort Myers 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maserati Tampa 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.