Handtool metal blades (e.g., putty knives, scrapers, screw drivers) manufacturing · Ohio

Everhard Products, Inc

Canton, OH · ~82 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Everhard Products, Inc runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Handtool metal blades (e.g., putty knives, scrapers, screw drivers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Everhard Products, Inc: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Handtool metal blades (e.g., putty knives, scrapers, screw drivers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Everhard Products, Inc safety composite

Everhard Products, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Everhard Products, Inc held a steady TCR band

Everhard Products, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332216 · Canton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Kreg Tool
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kreg Tool (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Everhard Products, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Everhard Products, Inc averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Handtool metal blades (e.g., putty knives, scrapers, screw drivers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Everhard Products, Inc TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Everhard Products, Inc falls in its industry

174 Handtool metal blades (e.g., p establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Handtool metal blades (e.g., p employers in Ohio.

Everhard Products, Inc (82 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Everhard Products, Inc
Everhard Products, Inc (82 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Everhard Products, Inc has more employees than the Handtool metal blades (e.g., putty knive median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 0 3 0
2016 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332216 · OH · Canton

174 Handtool metal blades (e.g., putty knives, scrapers, screw drivers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 330 employers in Canton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kreg Tool 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR OIL TOOL SOLUTIONS LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orbix dba Petol Gearench 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABILITIES UNLIMITED 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ridge Manor 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Power, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE FORJAK Industrial 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cook Paving & Construction Co., Inc. 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aultman Main Campus 3,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aultman Hospital 3,406 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center, Inc 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Mercy Hosp 2,321 FTE
NAT-TCR Dometic Litchfield 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nampa ID DI 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Building 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pollack Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cottages Wi, LLC 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar City UT DI 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverton UT DI 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE D2330 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.