Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing · California

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga: 7.3 TCR = 221% of Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga safety composite

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga: 4.6 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga's TCR rose 1.8 from 4.6 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 221% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #15/19
  • PHOTO King Electrical Manu…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: King Electrical Manufacturing Co (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga averages 7.3 TCR (221% of the Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga TCR series: 2022=4.6 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga falls in its industry

461 Coolers, refrigeration, manufa establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 19 Coolers, refrigeration, manufa employers in California.

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga (50 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga
Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga (50 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Everidge, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga has fewer employees than the Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 2.1 3 0 0
2023 10.9 8.2 4 0 0
2022 4.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

461 Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR King Electrical Manufacturing Co 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR STULZ Air Technology Systems, Inc. - Dayton, TN 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Coil 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heating and Cooling Products Mount Vernon 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Carvana Elyria 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Itasca 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RevMax 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central New York Feeds, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Simone Construction Services 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robies Refrigeration, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerset Coca-Cola 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greif Inc. (Bay Minette Tube Plant) 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.