Distribution of electric power · New Hampshire

Eversource - Lancaster

Lancaster, NH · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eversource - Lancaster runs at 371% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Eversource - Lancaster: 4.5 TCR = 371% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eversource - Lancaster safety composite

Eversource - Lancaster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eversource - Lancaster: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

Eversource - Lancaster's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Lancaster, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 371% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO Mineral Point Operat…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mineral Point Operations Bldg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Eversource - Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eversource - Lancaster averages 4.5 TCR (371% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eversource - Lancaster TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Eversource - Lancaster falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Distribution of electric power employers in New Hampshire.

Eversource - Lancaster (24 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eversource - Lancaster
Eversource - Lancaster (24 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eversource - Lancaster has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2022 7.4 3.7 2 0 0
2021 10.4 10.4 3 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NH · Lancaster

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 13 employers in Lancaster, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mineral Point Operations Bldg 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Division Tuscaloosa Snow Mills Complex 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augusta Operating 2103 North Leg Drive 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Patricio Electric Cooperative, Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Granite Ridge Energy Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Derry 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hampshire Electric Cooperative Pemi 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Newport 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weeks Medical Center 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0033-0033-02532 FAC-02532-LANCASTER-NH 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-02532 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000002532 81 FTE
NAT-TCR Iosco County Road Commission 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville FL Millwork 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hewitt 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oxmoor 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valu Home Center #49 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Steel #1 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hungerford Growers Gin, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valu Home Center #18 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.