Silica, amorphous, manufacturing · South Carolina

Evonik Charleston Plant

Name: Evonik Charleston Plant Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Goose Creek, SC · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evonik Charleston Plant runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Silica, amorphous, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Evonik Charleston Plant: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Silica, amorphous, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evonik Charleston Plant safety composite

Evonik Charleston Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Evonik Charleston Plant held a steady TCR band

Evonik Charleston Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Goose Creek, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/8
PHOTO HoneywellAL37
BOOK 4y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HoneywellAL37 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Albemarle

0.2
Westlake Chemi

0.2
HoneywellAL37

0.1
Ingleside Plan

0.1
This site

0

What this shows Evonik Charleston Plant averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Silica, amorphous, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Evonik Charleston Plant TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Evonik Charleston Plant falls in its industry

418 Silica, amorphous, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 8 Silica, amorphous, manufacturi employers in South Carolina.

Evonik Charleston Plant (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Evonik Charleston Plant has fewer employees than the Silica, amorphous, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · SC · Goose Creek

418 Silica, amorphous, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 85 employers in Goose Creek, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	HoneywellAL37	CHICKASAW, AL	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ingleside Plant	GREGORY, TX	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Albemarle	PASADENA, TX	0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Westlake Chemical Sout	LAKE CHARLES, LA	0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Walther Farms SC	WINDSOR	26 FTE
STATE-SIZE	COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER	GASTON	26 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Simpsonville Operations Center	SIMPSONVILLE	26 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Savage Rd. Crew Quarters	CHARLESTON	26 FTE
CITY-NEAR	APS-3 KBR	Goose Creek	575 FTE
CITY-NEAR	APS-3	Goose Creek	548 FTE
CITY-NEAR	W. International SC, LLC	Goose Creek	499 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2928	Goose Creek	473 FTE
NAT-TCR	Atlanta - Phipps	Atlanta, GA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Gap Inc. - Corporate	San Francisco, CA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Meijer 208	Lincoln Park, MI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hampton Inn & Suites	Kenosha, WI	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Fairfield Inn Kodak	Kodak, TN	26 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Entergy Jonesboro	Hodge, LA	26 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Springhill Suites Birmingham	Birmingham, AL	26 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Winchester MB	Winchester, VA	26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.