Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Virginia

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD

Sterling, VA · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD: 2.4 TCR = 36% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD safety composite

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD: 0.0 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 4.78× in 2024

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD's TCR rose 11.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 11.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Sterling, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.4 · 36% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #13/165
  • PHOTO ZOOM LOGISTICS LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ZOOM LOGISTICS LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Excel Courier, Inc. IAD averages 2.4 TCR (36% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Excel Courier, Inc. IAD falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 165 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Virginia.

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD (27 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Excel Courier, Inc. IAD
Excel Courier, Inc. IAD (27 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Excel Courier, Inc. IAD has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 11.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · VA · Sterling

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 222 employers in Sterling, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ZOOM LOGISTICS LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORD9 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PackagePointe Delivery 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazing Home Delivery LLC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Temperanceville Hatchery 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Degesch America Weyers Cave 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Potomac Energy Center, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Mount Ofc and Svc Ctr 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDC4 868 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Dulles 007 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prospect Waterproofing Company 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2038 421 FTE
NAT-TCR Lansing Mi 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Key Cooperative - S14 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chapel Electric Co., LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0084 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Haddad Hyundai 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Littleton BNSF - AAW 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pilgrims Nacogdoches Live Haul 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.