Refinery, petroleum, construction · Louisiana

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG)

Geismar, LA · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Refinery, petroleum, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Refinery, petroleum, construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) safety composite

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) held a steady TCR band

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Geismar, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/75
  • PHOTO NTACT CONSTRUCTORS, …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NTACT CONSTRUCTORS, LTD. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Refinery, petroleum, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) falls in its industry

809 Refinery, petroleum, construct establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 75 Refinery, petroleum, construct employers in Louisiana.

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG)
EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

EXCEL Maintenance @ Renewable Energy Group (REG) has fewer employees than the Refinery, petroleum, construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · LA · Geismar

809 Refinery, petroleum, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 127 employers in Geismar, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NTACT CONSTRUCTORS, LTD. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Exxon Baytown 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105128 - P66 Rodeo Renewed: PTU/FRU BB 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bluewater Constructors, Inc. 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perforex Forest Services 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carville Energy, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teche Power Station 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lieberman 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF - Geismar 1,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brock Services Geismar LA 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turner at Shell Chemical LP Geismar LA 674 FTE
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY-03 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SDR021 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE REC 23, Inc., dba Audi Washington 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rudy Road PRTF 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Communications Center 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.