Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · California

Exeter Bulk Container

Exeter, CA · ~142 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Exeter Bulk Container runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Exeter Bulk Container: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Exeter Bulk Container safety composite

Exeter Bulk Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Exeter Bulk Container held a steady TCR band

Exeter Bulk Container's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Exeter, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/111
  • PHOTO Great Northern Corpo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Northern Corporation - Twin Cities Fulfillment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Exeter Bulk Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Exeter Bulk Container averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Exeter Bulk Container TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Exeter Bulk Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 111 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in California.

Exeter Bulk Container (142 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Exeter Bulk Container
Exeter Bulk Container (142 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Exeter Bulk Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CA · Exeter

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Exeter, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Northern Corporation - Twin Cities Fulfillment 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winston Salem Permanent 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenville - D060 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Anatolio Munoz 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capay Farms 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Firestorm Wildland Fire Suppression Inc. 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOLV, Inc 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gutierrez FLC Inc 1,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exeter - F031 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR farm labor 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR CENTRAL CALIFORNIA BAKING CO 214 FTE
NAT-TCR Saft America Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Morrison of Georgia, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Helicopter- Hurst 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TouchPad Electronics LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Vehicle Logistics - Driveaway 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Plastics, Picayune, MS 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2436 - Richmond East 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0895 - Bradley 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.