Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Exide Technologies - Lampeter

Lancaster, PA · ~188 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Exide Technologies - Lampeter runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Exide Technologies - Lampeter: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Exide Technologies - Lampeter safety composite

Exide Technologies - Lampeter scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2019

Exide Technologies - Lampeter injury rate improved

Exide Technologies - Lampeter's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #93/183
  • PHOTO MEP - Main
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEP - Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Exide Technologies - Lampeter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Exide Technologies - Lampeter averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Exide Technologies - Lampeter TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Exide Technologies - Lampeter falls in its industry

2,838 Drums, plastics (i.e., contain establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 183 Drums, plastics (i.e., contain employers in Pennsylvania.

Exide Technologies - Lampeter (188 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Exide Technologies - Lampeter
Exide Technologies - Lampeter (188 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Exide Technologies - Lampeter has more employees than the Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2018 3.9 1.9 6 2 0
2017 5.3 5.3 10 0 0
2016 3.6 3.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · PA · Lancaster

2,838 Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEP - Main 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schluter Systems, LP 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sinclair and Rush Fenton 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schafer Systems (2018) Inc. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE UGI Bethlehem 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benchmark Construction Company, Inc. 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103461 - Hickory Run Energy Station 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&R Enterprises, LLC 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Sims Bark Tuscumbia 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-ININD525 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-69-Pottery Barn 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health - PD - Salt Lake City, UT 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE IA,SHELDON - Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inphi Corporation - SCL 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5055 - NV Clark County Detention Center 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overture Center 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.