Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Wisconsin

Experimental Mill

Neenah, WI · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Experimental Mill runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade C.

Experimental Mill: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Experimental Mill safety composite

Experimental Mill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Experimental Mill held a steady TCR band

Experimental Mill's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Neenah, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Syngenta Greensboro
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Syngenta Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Experimental Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Experimental Mill averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Experimental Mill TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Experimental Mill falls in its industry

319 Life sciences research and dev establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Life sciences research and dev employers in Wisconsin.

Experimental Mill (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Experimental Mill
Experimental Mill (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Experimental Mill has fewer employees than the Life sciences research and development l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · WI · Neenah

319 Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 182 employers in Neenah, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Greensboro 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering Complex 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waymo HQ 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chamblee Campus 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Mills Corporate Office 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chilton Dairy, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Resources International - Distribution Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steam Service Headquarters 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neenah IOEC Corporate Offices 1,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miron Construction Co., Inc. 1,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Neenah 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Neenah 1,399 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flagstar Construction 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jason'S Greenhouse, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lucky Car Wash 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aluflam North America LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.