Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Arizona

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc.

Gilbert, AZ · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 81% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. safety composite

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. held a steady TCR band

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Gilbert, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/25
  • PHOTO RSA Engineered Produ…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RSA Engineered Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (81% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=7 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 25 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Arizona.

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc.
EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

EXTEX Engineered Products, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 0 2 0
2022 7.0 7.0 0 2 0
2021 8.1 8.1 0 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AZ · Gilbert

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 261 employers in Gilbert, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RSA Engineered Products 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamco America 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jari Drive 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safran Landing Systems Kentucky LLC 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABACA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatum 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonopah 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030512 1,613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030512-512001 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-512 911 FTE
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Detroit 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USG Interiors Cartersville 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Humble clearance center Outlet #2909 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR C &T's Bargain Market 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE New England Orbital Services, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winchester Farm 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahuta Tool Corp 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Park Boring Co. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.