Postal delivery services, local, operated on a contract basis · California

Extreme Delivery Services LLC

Riverside, CA · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Extreme Delivery Services LLC runs at 598% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Postal delivery services, local, operated on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade F.

Extreme Delivery Services LLC: 26.9 TCR = 598% of Postal delivery services, local, operated on a contract basis BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Extreme Delivery Services LLC safety composite

Extreme Delivery Services LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.2

2022→2024

Extreme Delivery Services LLC injury rate improved

Extreme Delivery Services LLC's TCR fell 32.2 from 45.6 in 2022 to 13.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 45.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=45.6 · 2023=21.6 · 2024=13.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Riverside, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.9 · 598% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1238/1240
  • PHOTO PATERSON_1433632
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PATERSON_1433632 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Extreme Delivery Services LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Extreme Delivery Services LLC averages 26.9 TCR (598% of the Postal delivery services, local, operated on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Extreme Delivery Services LLC TCR series: 2022=45.6 · 2023=21.6 · 2024=13.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Extreme Delivery Services LLC falls in its industry

13,818 Postal delivery services, loca establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1238 safest of 1240 Postal delivery services, loca employers in California.

Extreme Delivery Services LLC (71 employees, TCR 26.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Extreme Delivery Services LLC
Extreme Delivery Services LLC (71 employees, TCR 26.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

Extreme Delivery Services LLC has more employees than the Postal delivery services, local, operate median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.5 0.0 8 0 0
2023 21.6 2.4 9 0 0
2022 45.6 32.6 20 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · CA · Riverside

13,818 Postal delivery services, local, operated on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PATERSON_1433632 26.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARYLAND HEIGHTS_1435038 26.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 284236-KCM-PARKWAY STA 27.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARKSTON CARRIER ANNEX_1358201 26.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE M Pineda Farming Co 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE AgSource Services, LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schafer Ranch, Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & J Dondero Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR Viking Kitchen Cabinets, LLC d/b/a/ Surfaces 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brogan Landscaping, Inc.- Southern Region 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Eye Surgery Center of the Carolinas 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Baraga Correctional Facility 26.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE NLJ Logistics LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nigrelli, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Microtech, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Butts Foods - Jackson 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.