Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Washington

Faber Construction

Lynden, WA · ~112 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Faber Construction runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Faber Construction: 4.6 TCR = 160% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Faber Construction safety composite

Faber Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Faber Construction injury rate improved

Faber Construction's TCR fell 5.8 from 8.4 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=6.4 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lynden, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 160% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #81/127
  • PHOTO 1021 - BELFOR Spring…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1021 - BELFOR Springfield OR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Faber Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Faber Construction averages 4.6 TCR (160% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Faber Construction TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=6.4 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=1 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Faber Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 127 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Washington.

Faber Construction (112 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Faber Construction
Faber Construction (112 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Faber Construction has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2023 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 5.3 1.1 4 1 0
2019 6.4 0.0 6 0 0
2018 6.3 1.1 6 0 0
2016 8.4 7.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · WA · Lynden

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 52 employers in Lynden, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1021 - BELFOR Springfield OR 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FacilityBUILD, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Firmo Construction, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirby Nagelhout Construction Co. Pendleton, OR 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakehaven Water & Sewer District 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone General Contractors 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington Commercial Painters - Redmond 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Solutions 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lynden Door, Inc. 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maberry Packing LLC 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enfield Farms Inc 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christian Health Care Center 203 FTE
NAT-TCR Clark Manor 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Txiah - Iah Gateway 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carowinds 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mill Steel Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ortho Biologics, LLC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tremcar USA Inc 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andy Mast Greenhouses 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Relco LLC 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.