Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen

Hazleton, PA · ~246 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen safety composite

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2022→2023

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen injury rate improved

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen's TCR fell 1.8 from 2.6 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.6 · 2023=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Hazleton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #31/183
  • PHOTO Silver Line Building…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~246 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silver Line Building Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen TCR series: 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen falls in its industry

2,838 Cups, plastics (except foam), establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 183 Cups, plastics (except foam), employers in Pennsylvania.

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen (246 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen
Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen (246 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fabri-Kal a part of Pactiv Evergreen has more employees than the Cups, plastics (except foam), manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2022 2.6 1.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · PA · Hazleton

2,838 Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 79 employers in Hazleton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silver Line Building Products 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Munot Plastics, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matrix Tool Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tarkett 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE To-Jo Mushrooms Inc. 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArcelorMittal Conshohocken 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giant Eagle #0042 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Levin Furniture - Warehouse and Corporate 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AVP1 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Case Ready Hazleton PA 872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital - Hazleton 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Hazleton 722 FTE
NAT-TCR Electrical Professional Services, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ed Yamashiro, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5300 Germantown, MD 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grey's Anatomy Production 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springfield-110 Maple Street 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bosworth Company, Midland, TX 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Truck Group of south Dallas 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE DCA Reagan National Airport 246 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.