Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, plastics) merchant wholesalers · California

Fabricmate Systems, Inc.

Ventura, CA · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, plastics) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Fabricmate Systems, Inc.: 5.8 TCR = 262% of Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, plastics) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. safety composite

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Fabricmate Systems, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424950 · Ventura, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 262% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Decoral System USA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Decoral System USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fabricmate Systems, Inc. averages 5.8 TCR (262% of the Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, plastics) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Fabricmate Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

45 Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, employers in California.

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fabricmate Systems, Inc.
Fabricmate Systems, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Fabricmate Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, plastics) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.4 8.4 1 0 0
2018 14.7 7.3 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424950 · CA · Ventura

45 Wall coverings (e.g., fabric, plastics) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Ventura, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Decoral System USA 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Downey 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Painters Supply & Equipment Co. - Grand Rapids 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carol Stream Distributions Center 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 447 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 530 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6292-00000001 2,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSA Human Service Agency 1,516 FTE
NAT-TCR Chemicals Inc, USA 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Montgomery, NY - Renal Distr. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kittery School District - Shapleigh School 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR STP 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE M-16 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1300 Connellsville Road 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemicals Services, Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston Seaport Square Store 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.