Air-conditioning system (except window) installation · Texas

Facilities Mechanical, Inc.

Houston, TX · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air-conditioning system (except window) installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Facilities Mechanical, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 195% of Air-conditioning system (except window) installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. safety composite

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2023

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. injury rate improved

Facilities Mechanical, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2021=13.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 195% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #320/408
  • PHOTO Custom Aire Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom Aire Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Facilities Mechanical, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (195% of the Air-conditioning system (except window) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2021=13.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Facilities Mechanical, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Air-conditioning system (excep establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #320 safest of 408 Air-conditioning system (excep employers in Texas.

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Facilities Mechanical, Inc.
Facilities Mechanical, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Facilities Mechanical, Inc. has fewer employees than the Air-conditioning system (except window) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 13.5 10.8 5 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 8.5 2.8 3 0 0
2016 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TX · Houston

5,793 Air-conditioning system (except window) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custom Aire Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bosworth Company, LTD dba THE DARVILLE COMPANY 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Plumbing & Solar Engineering, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI Mechanical Inc 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE RCB Ventures, LLC dba Tri-Tex Grass 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cook Canyon Ranch 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedyard 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kurten Location 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Component Manufacturing Company - Plant 2 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hirschvogel Incorporated 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 214 Lci 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Thomaston 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henderson Terminal 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Image City Interiors, LLC. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thorne research - Trade center 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isometric Micro Molding, Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.