Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation services, computer systems or data processing · Wisconsin

Facility Gateway Corporation

Madison, WI · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Facility Gateway Corporation runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation services, computer systems or data processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Facility Gateway Corporation: 1.1 TCR = 226% of Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation services, computer systems or data processing BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Facility Gateway Corporation safety composite

Facility Gateway Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2018→2022

Facility Gateway Corporation injury rate improved

Facility Gateway Corporation's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541513 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.1 · 226% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P50
  • PHOTO Guilford County - In…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Guilford County - Information System Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Facility Gateway Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Facility Gateway Corporation averages 1.1 TCR (226% of the Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation services, computer systems or data processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Facility Gateway Corporation TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Facility Gateway Corporation falls in its industry

36 Facilities (i.e., clients' fac establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Facility Gateway Corporation (43 employees, TCR 1.1) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 143 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Facility Gateway Corporation
Facility Gateway Corporation (43 employees, TCR 1.1) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 143 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Facility Gateway Corporation has fewer employees than the Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541513 · WI · Madison

36 Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation services, computer systems or data processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Guilford County - Information System Services 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MICROSOFT OPERATIONS PUERTO RICO LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Sacramento-Technology Roll-Up (070010) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mount Carmel Medical Office Building #5 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holsum Irish Dairy 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock Receiving 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Generating Station 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR NJC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 2039-Blake Street 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-10D8932 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SJJC FBO Services LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG534 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISD 492 Austin AALASEC Coop 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1006 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG667 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.