Air passenger carriers, scheduled · Alaska

Fairbanks Alaska CS

Fairbanks, AK · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairbanks Alaska CS runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air passenger carriers, scheduled workplace, earning a grade C.

Fairbanks Alaska CS: 3.9 TCR = 87% of Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairbanks Alaska CS safety composite

Fairbanks Alaska CS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Fairbanks Alaska CS injury rate improved

Fairbanks Alaska CS's TCR fell 5.0 from 9.4 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Fairbanks, AK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO IAD IAD
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IAD IAD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Fairbanks Alaska CS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairbanks Alaska CS averages 3.9 TCR (87% of the Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairbanks Alaska CS TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Fairbanks Alaska CS falls in its industry

1,568 Air passenger carriers, schedu establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Air passenger carriers, schedu employers in Alaska.

Fairbanks Alaska CS (75 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairbanks Alaska CS
Fairbanks Alaska CS (75 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Fairbanks Alaska CS has fewer employees than the Air passenger carriers, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 5 0 0
2016 9.4 9.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · AK · Fairbanks

1,568 Air passenger carriers, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 161 employers in Fairbanks, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IAD IAD 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Creek Aviation Services 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 75120006--ATL DELTA WHLCH 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - SJC 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8940 SE ANCHORAGE 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE ConocoPhillips Alaska - Willow 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairbanks Base Unit 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barrow Utilities & Electric Cooperative, Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairbanks North Star Borough School District 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairbanks Memorial Hospital 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanana Chiefs Conference - All Other 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanana Chiefs Conference - CAIHC 463 FTE
NAT-TCR Koppers Guthrie 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Doraville 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Ceramic Products, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0018 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charleston Metal Products, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Falls Hardwoods 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Island Transportation Corp - West Babylon 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Western Atlantic Beach 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.