Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing · Georgia

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.)

Fairburn, GA · ~421 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.): 0.2 TCR = 4% of Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) safety composite

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2018

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) injury rate improved

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.)'s TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fairburn, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/506
  • PHOTO Estee Lauder - MWDC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~421 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Estee Lauder - MWDC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) averages 0.2 TCR (4% of the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) falls in its industry

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation A establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 506 Motor Freight Transportation A employers in Georgia.

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) (421 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.)
Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) (421 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) has more employees than the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehou median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.7 0.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Fairburn

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 98 employers in Fairburn, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Estee Lauder - MWDC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - LOreal 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx Supply Chain MGH-Blacklick 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Mills Covington Site 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toto USA Morrow Plant 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Industrial Co. - Buford, GA 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chief Specialty Packaging 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Material in Motion, LLC. 1,076 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA - USPS Fairburn9 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duracell Atlanta (MRU5102) 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Atlanta 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Sanofi Westborough 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Laird Controls North America Inc. - Warren 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips 801 Plum 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornwell Quality Tools Company Corporate 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 23 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leisure Services 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Cab LLC 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE RGH Enterprises - Twinsburg, OH Office 1909 421 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.