Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Minnesota

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington

Bloomington, MN · ~45 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington: 4.6 TCR = 217% of Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington safety composite

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2020→2024

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington injury rate improved

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.5 in 2020 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.5 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Bloomington, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 217% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #41/56
  • PHOTO Houston Mayo Shell CGI
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Mayo Shell CGI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington averages 4.6 TCR (217% of the Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington TCR series: 2020=7.5 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington falls in its industry

2,560 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 56 Construction machinery and equ employers in Minnesota.

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington (45 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington
Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington (45 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Fairchild Equipment - Bloomington has more employees than the Construction machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 10.4 7.8 4 0 0
2020 7.5 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Bloomington

2,560 Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Mayo Shell CGI 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hobart Service, New York/Long Island 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pena's Mechanical Contractors Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE District 45 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allstar Construction Commercial Op Co, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doran Construction Company, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hasslen Construction Company, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR Hubbard 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Montgomery RSC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Short Hills #625 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gettysburg Main 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hatchery 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bath 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaumont Martin Transport 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Department 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.