Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Minnesota

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake

Ham Lake, MN · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake: 2.3 TCR = 109% of Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake safety composite

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake injury rate improved

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Ham Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/56
  • PHOTO MH Columbus
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MH Columbus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake averages 2.3 TCR (109% of the Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake falls in its industry

2,560 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 56 Construction machinery and equ employers in Minnesota.

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake (35 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake
Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake (35 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Fairchild Equipment - Ham Lake has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Ham Lake

2,560 Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Ham Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MH Columbus 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH St. Louis 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR El Paso Location 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hammell Equipment Inc 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollymount 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scotch Prairie Farms LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Farm Systems Melrose 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Power Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR CECO Concrete : Minneapolis 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality Cleaning Inc. DBA QC Companies 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cool Air Mechanical Inc 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR McKinley Elementary 80 FTE
NAT-TCR Mechanical Services of Central Florida, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR KA Steel - Lemont 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Okeene Milling Company 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McLaughlin 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goldman Equipment, LLC - West Monroe 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Heights Elementary School 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flyway Excavating, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Middleton Elementary School 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.