Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Ohio

Fairlawn Haven

Archbold, OH · ~169 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairlawn Haven runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Fairlawn Haven: 7.3 TCR = 242% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairlawn Haven safety composite

Fairlawn Haven scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2017→2024

Fairlawn Haven injury rate improved

Fairlawn Haven's TCR fell 8.0 from 10.6 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 75.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.6 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=75.0 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Archbold, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 242% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #186/221
  • PHOTO 610869000 PNC PARK P…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 610869000 PNC PARK PREMIUM SERVICES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Fairlawn Haven in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairlawn Haven averages 7.3 TCR (242% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairlawn Haven TCR series: 2017=10.6 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=75 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Fairlawn Haven falls in its industry

6,952 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #186 safest of 221 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Fairlawn Haven (169 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairlawn Haven
Fairlawn Haven (169 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fairlawn Haven has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.7 3 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 10.2 4.3 11 1 0
2021 75.0 72.1 3 73 0
2020 9.9 8.5 3 11 0
2019 5.7 2.4 7 0 0
2018 9.2 2.3 12 0 0
2017 10.6 5.0 13 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · OH · Archbold

6,952 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 25 employers in Archbold, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 610869000 PNC PARK PREMIUM SERVICES 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legends - Tampa Yankees 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana State Hospital Evansville 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ADVENTIST CASTLE MC NUTRITION 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennsylvania Power Company 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Austin Co. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mason, Ohio 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCS Nitrogen Ohio L.P. 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAUDER WOODWORKING CO. 1,749 FTE
CITY-NEAR Archbold OH 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miller Bros. Const., Inc 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sauder Village 254 FTE
NAT-TCR DoorDash Essentials, DET-1 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Hickory - Airport 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DJC5 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Merryvale Assisted Living 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Juan, PR 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reynolds asphalt and Construction Company 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crescent Manufacturing 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Post Press Specialties 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.