Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · California

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen

Visalia, CA · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen runs at 314% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen: 11.9 TCR = 314% of Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen safety composite

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen: 10.6 → 13.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 13.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2022

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen's TCR rose 2.7 from 10.6 in 2019 to 13.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Visalia, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 314% of ind

  • DART 13.3 DART
  • RANK #366/387
  • PHOTO Sutter Valley Medica…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30869) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Family HealthCare Network - Goshen averages 11.9 TCR (314% of the Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen TCR series: 2019=10.6 · 2022=13.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Family HealthCare Network - Goshen falls in its industry

2,836 Physicians' (except mental hea establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #366 safest of 387 Physicians' (except mental hea employers in California.

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen (58 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Family HealthCare Network - Goshen
Family HealthCare Network - Goshen (58 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Family HealthCare Network - Goshen has fewer employees than the Physicians' (except mental health) offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.3 13.3 0 5 0
2019 10.6 2.1 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · CA · Visalia

2,836 Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 349 employers in Visalia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30869) 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Centennial Lakes Clinic Edina 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2078-South Lake Peds - Hville 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Isanti Clinic 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & R Farm Labor Contractor 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE RANCHO DEL MAR, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laurel Labor Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaweah Delta Health Care District 4,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Personnel 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 194 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 473 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR 161308-Carpentersville Po 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 381776-Col-Oakland Park Br 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 358115-Springville Po 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 356170-Oneonta Po 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ODW - Handgards 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE BRR Refrigeration HVAC LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thelin Recycling 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE KLS WP Orlando 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.