MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Mississippi

Family Medical Group of Union

Union, MS · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Family Medical Group of Union runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Family Medical Group of Union: 2.2 TCR = 58% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Family Medical Group of Union safety composite

Family Medical Group of Union scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Family Medical Group of Union: 6.0 → 69.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 69.4 TCR · DART/TCR 28.81× in 2021

Family Medical Group of Union's TCR rose 63.4 from 6.0 in 2018 to 69.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 28.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Union, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 63.1 DART
  • RANK #5/26
  • PHOTO Therapy Services Med…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Therapy Services Medina (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Family Medical Group of Union in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Family Medical Group of Union averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Family Medical Group of Union TCR series: 2018=6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=69.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Family Medical Group of Union falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 26 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Mississippi.

Family Medical Group of Union (23 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Family Medical Group of Union
Family Medical Group of Union (23 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Family Medical Group of Union has fewer employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 69.4 63.1 1 10 0
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MS · Union

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 12 employers in Union, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Therapy Services Medina 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhart County Correctional Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Estancias 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProHealth Physicians Group 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Grove Hatchery (MLO) 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmer's Gin Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pursue Energy 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Office Substation 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Laird Hospital 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ochsner Rush Laird Hospital 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR J. G. Alexander Nursing Center 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR JG Alexander Nursing Center 91 FTE
NAT-TCR Proterra Greenville 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Audi Ontario 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ShipBob Grapevine 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Welch Packaging Detroit 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Merit Construction Services, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garage Location 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transteck Inc. - York 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3077 Keystone 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.