MDs' (medical doctors), mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · New York

Family Practice North

Liverpool, NY · ~96 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Family Practice North runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors), mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Family Practice North: 1.3 TCR = 35% of MDs' (medical doctors), mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Family Practice North safety composite

Family Practice North scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−88.1

2022→2024

Family Practice North injury rate improved

Family Practice North's TCR fell 88.1 from 88.9 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 88.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=88.9 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621112 · Liverpool, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/21
  • PHOTO Lawrence Medical Group
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lawrence Medical Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Family Practice North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Family Practice North averages 1.3 TCR (35% of the MDs' (medical doctors), mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Family Practice North TCR series: 2022=88.9 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Family Practice North falls in its industry

269 MDs' (medical doctors), mental establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 21 MDs' (medical doctors), mental employers in New York.

Family Practice North (96 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Family Practice North
Family Practice North (96 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Family Practice North has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors), mental health, o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 88.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621112 · NY · Liverpool

269 MDs' (medical doctors), mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 141 employers in Liverpool, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lawrence Medical Group 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Associates Psychiatry 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walton Family Health Center and Center for Counseling 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nevada Comprehensive Pain Center 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE NYSEG- Binghamton ECC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1865 Palmer Avenue - L&M Builders Group LLC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joseph L. Balkan, Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE 511 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raymour & Flanigan Furniture 6,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Syracuse Electroncs Pkwy (1021) 2,126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Hillyard Co. - Hutchinson 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR K&I Ag Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacob Leinenkugel's Brewing Co. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jem D International (Michigan) 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE RLG - MedLit NC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Greensboro- Executive 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nor Cal Roseville 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garware Fulflex USA Inc 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.