Potatoes, peeled or cut, manufacturing · Texas

Farming Technology Incorporated

Houston, TX · ~150 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Farming Technology Incorporated runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Potatoes, peeled or cut, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Farming Technology Incorporated: 4.3 TCR = 105% of Potatoes, peeled or cut, manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Farming Technology Incorporated safety composite

Farming Technology Incorporated scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2023

Farming Technology Incorporated injury rate improved

Farming Technology Incorporated's TCR fell 1.3 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 105% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #17/32
  • PHOTO CO01 - Aurora Fulfil…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CO01 - Aurora Fulfillment Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Farming Technology Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Farming Technology Incorporated averages 4.3 TCR (105% of the Potatoes, peeled or cut, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Farming Technology Incorporated TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3 · BLS 4.1

Where Farming Technology Incorporated falls in its industry

376 Potatoes, peeled or cut, manuf establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 32 Potatoes, peeled or cut, manuf employers in Texas.

Farming Technology Incorporated (150 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Farming Technology Incorporated
Farming Technology Incorporated (150 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Farming Technology Incorporated has fewer employees than the Potatoes, peeled or cut, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 7 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 6 0 0
2019 6.5 5.5 13 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 12 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 11 0 0
2016 4.2 3.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · TX · Houston

376 Potatoes, peeled or cut, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CO01 - Aurora Fulfillment Center 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CF Corona 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Kitchen 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR J Bar B Foods Weimar 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coldwater Dairy 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Home Builders Mansfield 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vulcan Materials Company - DMG Paving & Grading 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ramco Erectors Inc 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #117 CHARLESTON, SC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ALUDEC USA - Molding 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Angeles Composite Technologies, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1386 Chalmette, LA 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BD St. Louis 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Providence Ri 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carrier Vibrating Equipment Inc. 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DBL8 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.