Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) · Hawaii

Farrington Highway Group Stations

Waipahu, HI · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Farrington Highway Group Stations runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) workplace, earning a grade F.

Farrington Highway Group Stations: 5.7 TCR = 203% of Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Farrington Highway Group Stations safety composite

Farrington Highway Group Stations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2017→2018

Farrington Highway Group Stations injury rate improved

Farrington Highway Group Stations's TCR fell 4.7 from 8.0 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.0 · 2018=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Waipahu, HI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Stacy and Witbeck, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stacy and Witbeck, Inc. - N180 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

Farrington Highway Group Stations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Farrington Highway Group Stations averages 5.7 TCR (203% of the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Farrington Highway Group Stations TCR series: 2017=8 · 2018=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Farrington Highway Group Stations falls in its industry

932 Railway construction (e.g., in establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Railway construction (e.g., in employers in Hawaii.

Farrington Highway Group Stations (74 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Farrington Highway Group Stations
Farrington Highway Group Stations (74 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Farrington Highway Group Stations has more employees than the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 8.0 3.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · HI · Waipahu

932 Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 87 employers in Waipahu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stacy and Witbeck, Inc. - N180 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104591 - GPA - CIT Berth 2 Upgrades 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Track Works LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C. White Marine, Inc. 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hawaii - All Operations 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foundations Hawaii, Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Times Supermarket Waimalu 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alven Corporation dba Hawaii Logistic Services 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-01 4,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4829-13216 653 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0485 - WAIPIO HI WHSE 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2314 334 FTE
NAT-TCR AUS-HCT-AUSTIN 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Marriott at Metro Center 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Go-To Transport, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mosaic Forest City/Waukon/Clarion 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bg-Mcd#2 Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aratana Therapeutics Kansas location 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. D. Mushrooms Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homestead Paving Co. 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.