General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Texas
Fas Dfw
Grapevine, TX · ~115 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 9.0
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Fas Dfw runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade F.
Fas Dfw: 9.0 TCR = 200% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Fas Dfw safety composite
Fas Dfw scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
46/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 9.02 per 100 workers
Safer than 19% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 1.79 per 100 workers
Safer than 73% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−9.4
2016→2019
Fas Dfw injury rate improved
Fas Dfw's TCR fell 9.4 from 12.1 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=12.1 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=2.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 484122 · Grapevine, TX ABOVE-IND · MID
Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 200% of ind
- DART 1.8 DART
- RANK #213/237
- PHOTO SEA
- BOOK 4y book
- INJ 35 inj
- SIZE ~115 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: SEA (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →
Fas Dfw in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Fas Dfw
9 TCR
- SEA
SEA
9 TCR
- Pittsburgh PA
Pittsburgh PA FXFE-PIT
9 TCR
- San Jose 219
San Jose 219
9 TCR
- Cinnaminson NJ
Cinnaminson NJ FXFE-CIN
9 TCR
What this shows Fas Dfw averages 9.0 TCR (200% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).
Fas Dfw TCR series: 2016=12.1 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 4.5
Where Fas Dfw falls in its industry
3,020 General freight trucking, long establishmentsSafer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.
Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 237 General freight trucking, long employers in Texas.
Fas Dfw has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8.7 | 6.9 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
484122 · TX · Grapevine
3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 145 employers in Grapevine, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.