Retail · California

Fashion Valley 544

San Diego, CA · ~430 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fashion Valley 544 runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retail workplace, earning a grade D.

Fashion Valley 544: 4.2 TCR = 125% of Retail BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fashion Valley 544 safety composite

Fashion Valley 544 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2017

Fashion Valley 544 injury rate improved

Fashion Valley 544's TCR fell 0.9 from 4.7 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 452111 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 125% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #78/182
  • PHOTO STR0121
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~430 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STR0121 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fashion Valley 544 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fashion Valley 544 averages 4.2 TCR (125% of the Retail BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fashion Valley 544 TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=3.8 · BLS 3.4

Where Fashion Valley 544 falls in its industry

1,987 Retail establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 182 Retail employers in California.

Fashion Valley 544 (430 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fashion Valley 544
Fashion Valley 544 (430 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Fashion Valley 544 has more employees than the Retail median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.8 2.1 9 0 0
2016 4.7 2.2 11 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

452111 · CA · San Diego

1,987 Retail employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STR0121 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unit #0221 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victoria Gardens 533 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vero Beach Indian River 819 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silent Springs LLC 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE BioLegend Way 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Edwards Air Force Base (1466) 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Schluter Systems Plattsburgh 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aiken Center (Scaik) 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR River Valley Health Care, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuscany Village Nursing Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Global Services Supply Chain Operations : UX-Grove City, PA 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita (South & North) (Kswic) 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrity Windows and Doors - Roanoke 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tempe Office 430 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.