Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing · California

Fashion Valley

San Diego, CA · ~81 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fashion Valley runs at 553% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Fashion Valley: 7.7 TCR = 553% of Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fashion Valley safety composite

Fashion Valley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2023

Fashion Valley injury rate improved

Fashion Valley's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=14.2 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=25.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 553% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/45
  • PHOTO Arizona Mills
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arizona Mills (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fashion Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fashion Valley averages 7.7 TCR (553% of the Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fashion Valley TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=14.2 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=25.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Fashion Valley falls in its industry

302 Shopping center (i.e., not ope establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 45 Shopping center (i.e., not ope employers in California.

Fashion Valley (81 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fashion Valley
Fashion Valley (81 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Fashion Valley has more employees than the Shopping center (i.e., not operating con median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 25.8 25.8 3 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2018 14.2 14.2 2 1 0
2017 4.5 1.7 8 0 0
2016 4.3 1.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · CA · San Diego

302 Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arizona Mills 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spotsylvania Towne Centre 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Choura Venue Services 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ontario Mills 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE STS Ranch LLC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. R CRAIN AND SONS, INC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramar 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR C0487 Gastonia 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Tire Center-Medford Commerce Drive 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bashas 100 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kujawa Enterprises Inc-KEI 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Services, LLC - Philadelphia Branch 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Four County Health & Rehabilitation 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Crossing of Edwardsville 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Imperia 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.