Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Connecticut

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley

Canton, CT · ~261 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley: 8.0 TCR = 210% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley safety composite

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2019

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley injury rate improved

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley's TCR fell 3.4 from 8.3 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Canton, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 210% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #60/110
  • PHOTO Springfield TN IDD A…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~261 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Springfield TN IDD Admin Unit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley averages 8.0 TCR (210% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 110 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Connecticut.

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley (261 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley
Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley (261 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Favarh - The ARC of the Farmington Valley has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.8 4.8 10 0 0
2018 10.3 9.7 17 0 0
2017 8.5 8.5 14 0 0
2016 8.3 8.3 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · CT · Canton

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 22 employers in Canton, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Springfield TN IDD Admin Unit 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4340-NH-WINSTON I 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawthorne 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inclusion Inc. 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mirion Technologies (Canberra), Inc. 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamden Markets LLC, dba ShopRite of Hamden 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE 55835 HARTFORD 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Arc of the Farmington Valley, Inc. 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Brook Health Care Center 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR ShopRite of Canton 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR 226_325 125 FTE
NAT-TCR Thor Motor Coach/Plant 750 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Netting 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wake County 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR #715 Bakkery Commissary 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westminster Suncoast 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE COH Fire Department 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twin Liquors, LP 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asahi Kasei Plastics North America 261 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.