Housekeeping services (i.e., cleaning services) · Alabama

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley

Valley, AL · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Housekeeping services (i.e., cleaning services) workplace, earning a grade B.

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley: 3.5 TCR = 78% of Housekeeping services (i.e., cleaning services) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley safety composite

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2023→2024

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley injury rate improved

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley's TCR fell 0.9 from 4.0 in 2023 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.0 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Valley, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 78% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #45/70
  • PHOTO Cleaning Services Co…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleaning Services Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley averages 3.5 TCR (78% of the Housekeeping services (i.e., cleaning services) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley TCR series: 2023=4 · 2024=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley falls in its industry

4,064 Housekeeping services (i.e., c establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 70 Housekeeping services (i.e., c employers in Alabama.

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley (80 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley
Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley (80 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Fayette Janitorial LLC - John Soules Valley has more employees than the Housekeeping services (i.e., cleaning se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AL · Valley

4,064 Housekeeping services (i.e., cleaning services) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 14 employers in Valley, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleaning Services Corporation 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PJS of Texas 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 152308 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8059 Slippery Rock SD EVS 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Production (Alabama) 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Birmingham 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Shell Chemical LP Saraland AL 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garrison Steel Erectors, Inc 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Soules Foods Valley 531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Soules Foods Valley Alabama 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR GFA 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 733 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Dedicated Cowpens 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Las Vegas 10501 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR T.L. Edwards, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Villa Nursing Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aqua Water Supply Corporation 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Place Nursing Center 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beverly 5310 Electric-Ma05 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neighbors, LLC. 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.