Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · North Carolina

Fayetteville Public Works Commission

Fayetteville, NC · ~635 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fayetteville Public Works Commission runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Fayetteville Public Works Commission: 3.0 TCR = 246% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fayetteville Public Works Commission safety composite

Fayetteville Public Works Commission scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2018→2021

Fayetteville Public Works Commission injury rate improved

Fayetteville Public Works Commission's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.9 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Fayetteville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 246% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #16/20
  • PHOTO Turk Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~635 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Turk Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Fayetteville Public Works Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fayetteville Public Works Commission averages 3.0 TCR (246% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fayetteville Public Works Commission TCR series: 2018=3.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3 · BLS 1.2

Where Fayetteville Public Works Commission falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 20 Electric power generation, fos employers in North Carolina.

Fayetteville Public Works Commission (635 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Fayetteville Public Works Commission (635 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Fayetteville Public Works Commission has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.0 2.2 19 0 0
2020 2.4 1.9 16 0 0
2019 2.6 2.2 15 1 0
2018 3.9 2.9 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Fayetteville

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Turk Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Sooner Power Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Illinois Power Cooperative 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, TAC - Tacoma Business Office 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DLT2 635 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5165 Winston Salem Assembly 636 FTE
STATE-SIZE Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wendell 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Erwin Manufacturing Complex 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Datamars Inc Temple 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Healthplex 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro Portland Fabrications 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE MCC 635 FTE
NAT-SIZE K102-M001 635 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marvin's Hardware 635 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services, Inc. 635 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.