Building cleaning services, janitorial · Colorado

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~189 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade B.

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs: 2.5 TCR = 55% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs safety composite

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2020

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs injury rate improved

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs's TCR fell 5.2 from 6.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #31/75
  • PHOTO ES-DELL CHILDRN AUS
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ES-DELL CHILDRN AUS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs averages 2.5 TCR (55% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=3 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 75 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Colorado.

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs (189 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs
FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs (189 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

FBG Service Corporation Colorado Springs has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 1.9 1.3 3 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.0 0.8 4 0 0
2016 6.0 5.2 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CO · Colorado Springs

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ES-DELL CHILDRN AUS 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Beach Gardens Med Ctr 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMS CAT of FLORIDA. LLC- ORL 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FBG Service Corporation Des Moines 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moltz Construction 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICI Holdings, LLC 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spec 7 Insulation 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Denver Manufacturing 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR FBG Service Corporation Des Moines 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LABOR 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SECO/WARWICK Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The CORE Group- NOCAL 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE FWT - Hicksville 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE FE Moran Security Solutions 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC - Biltmore Park 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medtronic Eatontown 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.